Samuels Yoelin Kantor Seymour & Spinrad, LLP
Announces That U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide Costly Question For
Small Business Owners
PORTLAND, OR — (No Date Given)
Lawsuit handled by Portland, Oregon law firm examines question whether
owners must be counted as employees, forcing expensive compliance
with federal antidiscrimination laws
PORTLAND, OR.
When Congress passed the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) in
1990, it purposefully excluded smaller companies, those with fewer
than 15 employees, because of the relatively high cost of compliance.
Congress did not address the question of whether owners would be
counted as employees, resulting in confusion for small businesses
and their advisors. Companies with 15-19 employees,
have been surviving in “the gray zone” between small
and large employers, said STEVEN W. SEYMOUR, of the law firm
of SAMUELS YOELIN KANTOR SEYMOUR & SPINRAD, LLP.
“Resolution of this issue will have far reaching impact for
small businesses throughout the country,” he added.
“Our
firm has a long-standing tradition of protecting small business
owners, all the way to the Supreme Court when necessary,”
said SEYMOUR. In the Petition for Review, SEYMOUR
pointed out to the Court that in the category of companies affected
by the outcome of this case, there are over 400,000 employers with
total annual payroll that exceeds 90 billion dollars.
In this case, Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates P.C., an Oregon
professional corporation, had four working shareholder owners, and
less than 15 employees. Where the owners are treated as employees,
the company is subject to the rigors of the ADA and other anti-discrimination
compliance. “We don’t think that businesses were
the target of Congress when the ADA was passed. In fact, we
think that Congress intended to exclude companies like this one
from bearing the same burdens that General Motors or Intel bear.”
The
bulk of our business clients are or have been stuck in this “gray
zone” at some time since 1990, and the costs of compliance
are growing. “Our clients rely upon our ability to help
them plan for contingencies,” SEYMOUR said. “But
in this situation, compliance costs can mean that our clients cannot
afford to provide the best for their employees and their customers.”
SEYMOUR and SAMUELS
YOELIN KANTOR SEYMOUR & SPINRAD, LLP associate ANDRIA
C. KELLY will present the case before the US Supreme Court early
next year.
|